Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Chad C. Mulligan

Yeah, I think the molten salt reactors are a good bet too—but I don’t think that they will deliver the profound price reduction that the fusion reactors promise.

The huge thing that the fusion reactors promise to do is convert electrons directly into electricity—unlike the fission reactors which convert the energetic electrons into heat.

But much of the driver in the USA for fusion reactors—is now coming from private money.

But the smell of success is in the air. So governments all over the world are investing big money into fusion.

If the fusion company in Washington state abides by their contract with microsoft—they will have a working fusion reactor delivering electricity to microsoft in 2028.

There’s a good chance you’ll still be around by then.


21 posted on 02/23/2024 8:43:44 AM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: ckilmer
But much of the driver in the USA for fusion reactors—is now coming from private money.

So why spend public money?

I've been around too long to be fooled by a media blitz.

22 posted on 02/23/2024 9:21:39 AM PST by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson