You are applying the European definition of right-left to politics. In Europe, there is no individualist politics of any note. There are no parties that support a European equivalent of American politics. It’s all big government and socialism won. Nobody argues against socialism. The debate between right and left in Europe is between keeping the monarchy or going full out Republic.
In European politics, rightwing is fascism and left wing is communism and being a centrist is still being a socialist, but a kind socialist where you can have freedom after giving your time and assets to the liberal, until the liberal is full. Once the liberal has been fed and is satiated, then you can exercise your right to freedom with you have left.
Hitler was on the left. He wasn’t a national socialist, in terms of only being concerned about Germany. Him and Stalin had plans to divide Europe in the middle. Hitler had plans to expand his empire once he solidified control of Europe.
His nationalist ambitions was to make Germany the New Rome. In that sense, the difference between him and the globalist liberal is that he wanted a Rome, while the globalist liberal didn’t want a national country to lead the world. But, economically, there was little difference between the two.
I’m just pointing out what Hitler wanted, in regards to whites. That’s all.
For Hitler, going after North America was an eventuality. Whether he could do it at the time or thirty years down the road or a hundred does not change what he wanted.
Of course I am. Germany is in Europe, duh.
It’s all big government and socialism won.
Even if this is true, who cares? It's Hitler's country. The thieving central bankers and globalists at the time had no right to impose hyperinflation and child sodomy on it.
In European politics, rightwing is fascism and left wing is communism and being a centrist is still being a socialist, but a kind socialist where you can have freedom after giving your time and assets to the liberal, until the liberal is full.
Hitler's National Socialism emphasized the family unit and community, but still gave people individual rights and freedoms. It has absolutely nothing to do with the type of socialism you're referring to, it wasn't Communism, and it wasn't the crony capitalism that's destroying America and Western nations today.
Hitler was on the left. He wasn’t a national socialist
He wasn't on the Left as we know it, damnit take the L on this, OK? Why did Germany rebound so quickly once the Nazis assumed power? I remember reading stories of German people who grew up in the 1930s and remembered how it was the greatest period of time for them. All under this "monster" Hitler.
That means everything is left wing in Europe. Fascism is most definitely a derivative of socialism; Mussolini always preached “social justice” and redistribution.