[Jane Long]

I already did read your silly post #40.

So, we’re to believe you, over other sources?

🤣🙃

[CathyWhite]

I already did read your silly post #40.
So, we’re to believe you, over other sources?

---

Welp, if you have a better source than the constitution, you’re welcome to believe that!

[Leaning Right]

I’ve given some thought to this (when you’re retired you’ve got the time). And I’ve come to the surprising conclusion that CathyWhite is correct.

I would not have bet on that when I first read her post.

I carefully read the 22A. It’s poorly worded. They should have talked about eligibility, and not about being elected. Those are two different things. Eligibility is much stricter, as it even covers possible appointments.

As I noted in my post #83, the Supreme Court would probably not allow anyone to exploit this loophole. But the loophole, it does exist.