[Maybe they want to determine if she was dead prior to the shooting. #47]
How did she get dead before the shooting?
[C’mon, It would not be the first time people were shocked to find a loving husband took his wife out. Happens a lot. #76]
Sure sounds like you suggested or implied the sheriff murdered her.
[No?]
I don’t know what they are investigating. But the carbine is right at 36” long. The muzzle would be less than a foot away from his face. It should have been obvious if it was self-inflicted from the powder burns. The article says he was hit at least twice. After shooting yourself in the jaw once, do you think you could hold the carbine steady enough to pull off another self-inflicted but non fatal shot to the face? It’s too farfetched to me. Seems like a lot of trouble and risk to shoot up your wife, car, and self to try and cover up domestic violence. There had already been several attempts on his life before. If he wanted her dead, he could have just shot her through the house window, quickly hid the rifle, and claimed someone hit her by mistake.
Hey Farmerbob, is my comment below not true?
C’mon, It would not be the first time people were shocked to find a loving husband took his wife out. Happens a lot.
???
Which seems a bit odd in itself. How could they not know how many times the husband was shot? Is this the same county where they opted not to conduct and autopsy on his wife...Right Farmerbob?
You're not paying attention bob. I never once suggested or implied the husband shot himself. Did you not notice that before burping up more BS?
Would it be impossible for the husband to have used an accomplice? Do you think that would be the first time ever a murderer used and accomplice to inflict injury upon himself in an effort to appear to be a victim?
??
Why are you ignoring my quesitons?