>>
Is there a good summary of the interview somewhere?
>>
Of course not. How can there be? All summaries would be filtered and edited by whoever does the summary.
What is out there is a transcript. It’s long. You can scroll through it.
We have reached a point in society where nothing from the media can be believed. This exercise in listening was the best journalism done in decades.
Carlson should this will all the other hated figures of the western world.
I have seen talk the past 48 hours demanding all such things have some stamped indicator in the upper right corner of the Q&A video saying that video should have the equivalent of a Surgeon General’s warning on it.
If you ask who decides this the reply will flow back and forth and eventually it reaches a particular conclusion — because people are not capable of forming their own opinions and they should be told what opinion to have.
The Wiki shows — at the Battle of Stalingrad —
400,000 German troops
220,000 Italians
200,000 Hungarians
143,000 Romanians
This is what defines Russian thinking. Germany did not invade Russia. Europe invaded Russia. Tracing that back to what happened in Poland (and Romania and Hungary) in terms of whatever semi-revisionist details the modern foreign ministries want to present does not change those numbers above. Those are not token forces. That is the European Army the Soviets faced.
Deep scars on the Russian psyche. Not much different from the scars on the British psyche from German bombing.