Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Well, they got more out of the fuel than the laser delivered, so that’s nice. But I’m sure they didn’t ‘break even’ when taking into account:

-powering the lasers
-powering the confinement scheme
-running the vacuum pumps
-refining the fuel
-cooling everything
etc etc

That’s the thing about these fusion “break even” reports: it’s largely a matter of zooming in to the fine scale. It’s kind of like saying your running back “advanced the ball!”, but then you realize he moved it half a yard out to the one yard line, and the end zone is still 99 yards away.

Still, it’s progress.


16 posted on 02/07/2024 7:24:29 AM PST by verum ago (I figure some people must truly be in love, for only love can be so blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: verum ago

“-powering the lasers”

Just one stage of the laser amplifier is less than 50% efficient. I would not be surprised that the input might be 10x the delivered energy.

“powering the confinement scheme”

Zero. Inertial confinement.


22 posted on 02/07/2024 7:52:43 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: verum ago

I don’t know the future holds be it just may be far cheaper to burn dollars to keep warm then anything these yokels are coming up with...


45 posted on 02/10/2024 6:55:09 AM PST by unread (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the REPUBLIC..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson