Posted on 02/05/2024 12:12:46 PM PST by Eccl 10:2
(Excerpt) Read more at bigcharts.marketwatch.com ...
“Show me where it closed at 175.”
I didn’t reference closing price.
“Maybe DWAC’s meteoric rise in 2024 has something to do with Trump’s odds of winning in November looking better and better.”
Nothing like the run from 10 to 175 in 2022.
“That happened when DWAC first went public.”
It was over a year after it went public ...
“when the merger happens, it jumps up and DJT is the bulk of that.”
Why did stockholders keep voting to delay the merger ...
That’s not at all what happened. The merger was completely delayed by the SEC which is run by the CFO of Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The voters voted to EXTEND the time needed to get the merger done. Now it’s good through Sept 24. Merger should be done by EOQ
Eccl is right. You try to pick out things to make the stock/company look bad but (respectfully) you REALLY don’t know what you’re talking about.
LOL
Here again, you are a clueless wonder. Why don’t you just come out and say you hate Trump? It’s clear you don’t want the details of what’s going to get in the way of your agenda.
DWAC is a spac that has NO income. They have $300m in cash that transfers to TMTG when the merger happens. They have to post every scenario in filings, as does every other publicly traded company.
“The voters voted to EXTEND the time needed to get the merger done.”
I stand corrected. If the extension was not approved, DWAC would be liquidated and shares repurchased @ $10.
you should seriously quit posting. You have no idea what you’re talking about. You try to make other posters here look stupid but you’re clearly wearing the crown with that one. DWAC went from 10-175 within 2 days or so of the ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE MERGER WITH TMTG.
“DWAC is a spac that has NO income. They have $300m in cash that transfers to TMTG when the merger happens. They have to post every scenario in filings, as does every other publicly traded company.”
SEC has recognized the loopholes in SPAC reporting and is working to close them.
Of course you didn't.
Full context is not your thing.
“Full context is not your thing.”
My post was 100% accurate as stated.
My post was 100% accurate as stated.
Sure. As was my comment about the context of your post.
it really wasn’t. Why are you so desperate to prove your point that this is somehow a failed transaction?
The stock ran to $175 before the shorts could jump in and tamp it down.
It ran to $58 in January on the same day the biggest hedge fund was hacked, prohibiting anyone from SHORTING.
We get that you don’t like it but why all the effort to discredit it?
“it really wasn’t.”
It was’
“Why are you so desperate to prove your point that this is somehow a failed transaction?”
I am not trying to prove it is a failed transaction. I am just pointing out facts.
Why do you so frequently quibble and bicker with other FReepers? You should have your FR username changed to ‘Bickerson’
“DWAC is a spac that has NO income.”
Whose value is based on a private company not required to disclose as a public company is required.
you’re not pointing out any facts. you’re picking out little details that support your negative agenda with utter disregard to the big, true picture. but seriously, good luck with that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.