Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: brookwood
While clinical trials are often misleading, anecdotal evidence and conjecture are more likely to be useless.

Nonsense. Sometimes people noticing what is blown off as *anecdotal accounts* is the beginning of people noticing a trend.

Clinical trials *sometimes* misleading?????

Considering the increase in revelation of the amount of fraud in *studies*, I'd consider anecdotal evidence to be far more reliable than deliberate fraud.

6 posted on 02/04/2024 9:19:07 AM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
Here's my "anecdote", not covid related. A couple of years before covid, I was in for a routine exam, and nurse gave me a flu shot and pneumonia shot. Fifteen minutes later as I was walking to my car, I suddenly had so much knee and hip pain that I could barely walk. I hobbled back in to the doctor. He said the shot would not do that. But here's the thing. I had never before or since had pain like that. And I had never had a flu or pneumonia shot ever before that. I don't need a peer-reviewed double-blind study to know the two were related.

As I told a relative, who is a doctor, when you dismiss anecdotes you are dismissing patients' personal experiences.
30 posted on 02/04/2024 10:01:49 AM PST by Calvin Cooledge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson