Posted on 02/04/2024 7:36:24 AM PST by marcusmaximus
The reported appearance of former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in the Russian capital has sparked intense speculation over the purpose of the conservative media personality's visit to Moscow.
Carlson arrived in Moscow on February 1, and was spotted attending the Bolshoi Theater in the capital, according to Russian outlet Mash.
Questions quickly swirled over why the TV anchor would have traveled to Moscow, and whether he intended to interview Russian President Vladimir Putin during the visit.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
I'm sure you recognize this monster, meggieZZ.
It's who you see when you look in your mirror.
HEIL MEGGIE!
>LMAO. There really is something wrong with these people. Their obsessive nature makes me laugh at them and simultaneously gives me the creeps.<
They make me gag.
Every one of them, a Sue Ann Nivens, (including the males).
They’re the type that get stuffed into lockers in middle/high school.
“It’s who you see when you look in your mirror.”
No, he’s just an actor. Me? I’m not.
Heh! That’s probably part of the reason they’re the way they are.
I am not knowledgeable enough on the topic to have a strong opinion on it, although I do enjoy reading the oldest of history books that might predate some of the history revision of events and some of the history books written in the 1920s seem to reflect that view point as well.
I am definitely open to new information on the topic though
He’s not an idiot. Not only will his information have already been loaded, perhaps published before he returns. But, he has staff and attorneys.
You seem to have an issue with Tucker.
Putin and Russian chauvinists of his ilk think Ukraine is part of Russia and Ukrainians are just “bad” Russians. If believing Ukrainians have a right to defend their borders, language and culture against a colonizing fascist army is “warmongering” so be it. As a Reagan conservative I wear that tired Chomskite and populist epitet as a badge of honor.
Are you aware that the biolabs were built there when Ukraine was part of the USSR, and were not removed when the US and Russia agreed to protect Ukraine if they would give all their nukes back to Russia. If there was nasty stuff there from the USSR days, they probably removed it along with the nukes but left the biolabs for agricultural purposes—studying and treating plant and animal ills.
Just like Kitty Genovese's neighbors were anti-getting-dragged-into-another-neighborhood-squabble.
Regards,
I guess I missed the part where Putin was given a seat at the NATO Roundtable and allowed to interfere in the decisions of sovereign nations.
Putin has no say in such matters. NATO membership is a matter solely of NATO members. NATO never had a say in who could join the C.I.S. (or its military arm). By the same token, Russia has no say in who could join us.
Simply "declaring" something gives one absolutely no moral authority or other justification to also enforce that declaration.
A rapist "declaring" that he is going to rape someone does not give that rapist any right. Nor can the resistance of the rape-victim then properly be characterized as "provocation."
Regards,
I see.
This time, I'll cut you a tiny bit of slack:
You did not specify that the post you were referencing was a Meme created to ridicule Zeepers when you commented to me on a sub thread about my original text comment without a graphic of any kind.
I don't recall it specifically, however I'm sure the "meme with 4 abstract looking ghouls howling" was created to ridicule Zeepers, possibly by a FReeper.
However the sub thread posts, (which you should have followed back to my original comment), contained none of these anti Zeeper images.
The subject of the sub thread was a real Zelensky ridiculing video as a banner for comment threads ridiculing Zelensky Zeepers.
Thus, you and I were not talking about the same thing.
However all my comments still stand, as they were proper and accurate for the sub thread subject being discussed.
“Thus, you and I were not talking about the same thing.”
I believe you post from the most accurate sources as do I.
Somewhere in the middle....
Putin has 80 plus approval ratings per western polling
A bit more complicated than that but yes he’s against our involvement
You’re right but he’d interviewed Barger and 81 being right leaning for the most part politically are loud Tucker fans
So he catered when asked
I myself have had two Outlaws MC employees work for me one still current and one was best worker I ever had
And they had my back if needed which is nice
Two years ago a deranged dope camper from a huge encampment behind my biz tried to attack me with a seven inch fixed blade
When he heard about it he unasked ran down there from his home 30 miles away armed and wandered right into the 1200 drug addict very dangerous camp looking for the well known violent guy
Last seen that guy was literally running up over the hill by the Cumberland river lol
So there is that aspect
Very loyal
I also had dealings with the Bandidos on the coast late 70s with no issues
But there is protocol and it’s not for me and many are into meth
And I don’t like the way many deal with women
It’s not for me but I can navigate it if that makes sense
Maybe tucker felt the same
One thing Scullys advice to the Stones at altamont to use HA was disastrous
The Stones ain’t the dead and that barren cold speedway wasn’t Golden Gate Park or Keyseys Hondo acid test digs
Well you can go to Ukraine or Israel anytime you want to. I'm sure they will be thrilled to enlist such a noble and pure soul as yourself.
Nope, I regularly source from AP and Reuters, (more properly identified as Associated Presstitutes and Sewer Rooters), whom are among the most biased and untruthful Far Socialist Left Biased cesspools of Globalist and Islamic Political Operatives in the business of backstabbing.
“One thing Scullys advice to the Stones at altamont to use HA was disastrous
The Rolling Stones were only familiar with the UK branch of the Hell’s Angels and they thought that the American originals were cut from the same cloth. They guessed wrong.
When I worked bar at a pizza joint the biggest troublemakers were softball teams. Those fools would get drunk and belligerent and start fights. Whereas bikers didn’t give us any trouble.
Bit more info
https://medium.com/@stevebloom/the-debacle-at-altamont-whos-fault-was-it-30db46de7983
I’m listening to Stanley booths stones book right now while driving
He covers this being there 69 thru altamont
Yes the uk 81 were kittens compared to Oakland
I, personally, prefer employing Klansmen and Skinheads. When it comes to ex-Mafia, you can never really be sure if they aren't wired. Ex-cons (esp. those guilty of violent sex crimes) will also do, in a pinch, depending upon the task at hand. Pedos don't "play well" with regular cons, so I assign them to different jobs. Neo-nazis can be quite loyal and extremely reliable and have always proven quite punctual and polite, but I have to always keep them segregated from my "Nation of Islam" operatives. I once employed a former "Black Panther," but he was totally unreliable (actually left a witness!), so I let him go. Well, anyway, that's how I navigate it, if that makes sense.
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.