Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: IncPen

Sounds like she wanted this baby until she found out the child had Trisomy 13, then she wanted an abortion.

The baby would most likely die after being born and she can’t love the child for a few hours before it passes?

Even with Trisomy 13 the baby still feels the pain of being aborted.

What is wrong with these women?


4 posted on 02/03/2024 6:40:23 AM PST by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Morgana
What is wrong with these women?

You mean other than making their own decisions regarding their bodies and families.
9 posted on 02/03/2024 6:51:06 AM PST by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Abortion is NOT health CARE...for either the mother, or, the baby.


10 posted on 02/03/2024 7:01:01 AM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a conspiracy theory in ‘20 is now fact. Land of the sheep, home of the knaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
What is wrong with these women?

50 years of ghoulish propaganda making them believe it's "their" body and "their" choice. Disgusting, but I think in most cases the concept of fetal suffering doesn't even enter their minds. It doesn't absolve them of moral responsibility of course, murder is murder, but they have been deceived.
11 posted on 02/03/2024 7:03:25 AM PST by fluffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

“What is wrong with these women?”

Many babies with trisomy 13 and 18 die in the first year of life. Survivors all have severe cognitive impairment. There has been a debate among both professionals and parents about whether it is appropriate to provide life-sustaining interventions to babies with these serious conditions.

On one side of the debate are those who argue that there is no point in providing invasive, painful, and expensive procedures when the only outcomes are either early death or survival with severe cognitive impairment. Others suggest that, although mortality is high and cognitive impairment universal, babies with these conditions have an acceptable quality of life.

This is not an easy decision to make. Having a child that will have to go through those painful procedures to sustain a life that in most cases doesn’t rate anything over an acceptable quality of life.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28365826/

“...she can’t love the child for a few hours before it passes?”

By allowing it to live she may be torturing the child and doesn’t want to do that either. And there’s no way of telling that prior to birth. So maybe there is more pain in making the decision to end the life of a child in the womb as there is if the child suffers after birth.

But at least it has come down to medical reasons and not a blanket ruling by the feds for religious purposes or to garnish votes. So maybe the ousting of the misapplied Roe to get the federal government out of the medical business needs to apply to everyone except the parents and doctors and the pain it will cause both ways. Isn’t that why Roe was tossed and celebrated for getting it down to the level of the parents and medical teams?

I don’t fault people for having an opinion. But in the long run, it is just an opinion. And if it will alleviate pain in a child, doesn’t that measurement belong to the parents and how much pain they will suffer for the decision for the rest of their lives? So isn’t it one they should make?

wy69


15 posted on 02/03/2024 7:15:24 AM PST by whitney69 (yption tunnels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

“What is wrong with these women?”

Many babies with trisomy 13 and 18 die in the first year of life. Survivors all have severe cognitive impairment. There has been a debate among both professionals and parents about whether it is appropriate to provide life-sustaining interventions to babies with these serious conditions.

On one side of the debate are those who argue that there is no point in providing invasive, painful, and expensive procedures when the only outcomes are either early death or survival with severe cognitive impairment. Others suggest that, although mortality is high and cognitive impairment universal, babies with these conditions have an acceptable quality of life.

This is not an easy decision to make. Having a child that will have to go through those painful procedures to sustain a life that in most cases doesn’t rate anything over an acceptable quality of life.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28365826/

“...she can’t love the child for a few hours before it passes?”

By allowing it to live she may be torturing the child and doesn’t want to do that either. And there’s no way of telling that prior to birth. So maybe there is more pain in making the decision to end the life of a child in the womb as there is if the child suffers after birth.

But at least it has come down to medical reasons and not a blanket ruling by the feds for religious purposes or to garnish votes. So maybe the ousting of the misapplied Roe to get the federal government out of the medical business needs to apply to everyone except the parents and doctors and the pain it will cause both ways. Isn’t that why Roe was tossed and celebrated for getting it down to the level of the parents and medical teams?

I don’t fault people for having an opinion. But in the long run, it is just an opinion. And if it will alleviate pain in a child, doesn’t that measurement belong to the parents and how much pain they will suffer for the decision for the rest of their lives? So isn’t it one they should make?

wy69


16 posted on 02/03/2024 7:15:25 AM PST by whitney69 (yption tunnels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson