I’ve been telling people for years about ivermectin, mebendazole, and the rest of this stuff and sending them links to the relevant pubmed studies, but people are reluctant to believe it no matter how many studies you send them. They always say if those things were effective then why aren’t they already being used? I tell them big pharma has seriously corrupted the medical system but they just don’t want to believe it. Kinda stupid not to at least examine the many studies done on these off label drugs.
Yeah, Ivermectin has been on cancer researchers radar for a long time, long before the Wuhan flu was ever a gleam in Fauci’s eye.
The discoverer was awarded the Nobel prize for medicine for it. It is inexpensive to produce. It has remarkable potential and that was recognized before the WuHan flu debacle.
What’s kind of interesting to watch, as a general “I’m against it” kind of thing, if one were to accurately measure the acceptance or participation in vaccines and inoculations over the last several decades this is almost exclusively a left wing phenomenon.
What has occurred in reality, I’m not entirely sure. Sane, sober individuals haven’t changed their opinion on vaccines in general. No, the problem was always and ever a reluctance by many - regardless of any political leanings - toward a very, very specific vaccine, that in point of order had never been tested, and further of a new technology. “Authorized for emergency use on an experimental basis” does not equal “Approved” no matter how many times they say it.
But the Narrative must be maintained. It is an article of faith amongst the left, brought about by constant repetition, that “vaccine deniers” are all right wing lunatics who should be confined to concentration camps.