To: fireman15
I don't even think it was the refresh rates, it's that they needed to interlace the two eye videos. LCD screens didn't use interlace technologies; that was a CRT thing.
Some of that old software still works on my laptop, but with anaglyph images.
-PJ
12 posted on
01/26/2024 10:14:04 AM PST by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Political Junkie Too
I don't even think it was the refresh rates, it's that they needed to interlace the two eye videos. I was not using interlacing on the monitor that I used with them. I had the video card set for progressive video at a fast refresh rate where every other frame was for the other eye. The shutters merely blacked out one eye and then the other.
I suppose that it was possible that some setups did use interlacing, my monitor was compatible of a high enough refresh rate that this was not necessary or desirable.
20 posted on
01/26/2024 11:12:32 AM PST by
fireman15
(Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson