Posted on 01/25/2024 10:51:20 AM PST by Signalman
Dr. Gorka explains what Trump did when told that 300 members of the Wagner Group, Russian mercenaries, were running around the Middle East.
Good for President Trump turning those Ruzzian murderers into fertilizer.
I always throw this in the face these fools who think Trump was Putins buddy.
The selective credibility of the media reports on it usually appears soon after.
Also, they were Wagner mercenaries with Syrian soldiers. I heard an estimated 200 Russians dead and all their artillery and equipment was destroyed.
They story at the time was their commander said they had 100% casualties.
They strolled right into the killbox.
We warned Russia via a hotline set up between our military commanders in Syria that Russian forces had crossed the deconfliction line and were attacking the Conoco oil field/headquarters. This “hotline” was specifically intended to avoid situations like this. The Russians repeatedly denied there were Russian forces attacking the Conoco facility. So we treated them as terrorists. Russia could easily have warned the attackers they were about to get smashed. The Russian military seems to enjoy sending Wagner forces into meat grinders.
I agree. And when people bring up the Trump claim that he could end the Ukrain/Russian conflict in 24 hours, I am skeptical that it would go Russia’s way.
It was a historic firefight. The US guys were watching the mercs gear up the whole time. Artillery was dialed in, and Apaches were ready to fly.
>They strolled right into the killbox.
Yeah, at the time, someone released the audio of a soldier during the operation. It was brutal, and he was saying 90% were killed or injured. All artillery gone. No back up.
Trump also thoroughly embarrassed Putin because Putin’s operation was illegal so Putin had to quietly meet with the families of the dead.
“President Trump murders innocent Russian minorities in unprovoked attack. Worldwide condemnation and UN Justice to pursue crimes against humanity charges.” - CNN
“President Biden heroically protect minorities, people of color, and Muslims from vicious pro Putin pro Trump forces in peaceful nation of Syria. Biden to receive Nobel Peace Prize” - CNN
So awesome.
I tend to think because of Trumps ambivilence towards Ukraine and the fact the war ends when the US shuts off the spigots, Russia will get the slivers of land these fools are fighting for. There is historical reasoning for allowing it.
Liberals at least once thought he was too tough on Russia (while also claiming to be a puppet for Putin):
"When you actually look at the substance of what this administration has done, not the rhetoric but the substance, this administration has been much tougher on Russia than any in the post-Cold War era," said Daniel Vajdich, senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. Take military spending: Trump sought to add $1.4 billion for fiscal year 2018 to the European Deterrence Initiative — a military effort to deter Russian aggression that was initially known as the European Reassurance Initiative. That's a 41 percent increase from the last year of the Obama administration.
The president also agreed to send lethal weapons to Ukraine — a step that Obama resisted. And Trump gave U.S. forces in Syria more leeway to engage with Russian troops... "Those loosened rules of engagement have resulted in direct military clashes with Russian militants and mercenaries on the ground, actually resulting in one incident in hundreds of casualties on the Russian side," Vajdich said.
The administration has also imposed sanctions on dozens of Russian oligarchs and government officials... tough policies...have to be weighed against Trump's rhetoric, which is consistently friendly to Putin. ."There's a real disconnect between the president's words and the underlying policy," said Richard Fontaine, president of the Center for a New American Security. - https://www.npr.org/2018/07/20/630659379/is-trump-the-toughest-ever-on-russia
And from from 12/26/17 there is
Trump Sends Tank-Killing Missile To Fight Russia in Ukraine, But What Can It Do? By John Haltiwanger On 12/26/17 at 5:53 PM EST The decision to sell the Javelin missiles also comes not long after the Trump administration approved a limited weapons sale between American manufacturers and Ukraine of Model M107A1 sniper systems, ammunition and associated equipment...It's fired from the shoulder and tracks targets via infrared (heat signature). Instead of targeting the front or sides of tanks, which are thick with armor, the missile flies in an arc and hits the top of tank where the armor is weak..
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko defended the move in a Facebook post, thanking President Donald Trump for his support. Poroshenko further described the arms sale as "a transatlantic vaccination against the Russian virus of aggression." - https://www.newsweek.com/trump-tank-killing-missile-fight-russia-ukraine-759745
And as reported by abcnews.go.com om Dec. 23, 2020,
"Previously, as reported by ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News, Headlines & Videos om Dec. 23, 2020, "Trump admin approves new sale of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine.." The new package included Javelin anti-tank weapons, 150 missiles and two launchers, which came after a first sale, completed in March 2018, which included 210 Javelin missiles and 37 launch units.. "The Trump administration first approved the sale of Javelins to Ukraine in December 2017 -- a step that former President Barack Obama never took.... ..
Before that, "Russia's Putin praises Obama's missile defense decision" to "cancel a radar installation in the Czech Republic and ground-based interceptors planned for Poland," LA Times Sep 19, 2009
And those who protest NATO's overall spending of only about 3% of its GDP are opposing Trump. For contrary to being a Putin puppet as the Left prevaricates - and who were blaming him in Feb. 2020 for this invasion,
4/3/19
July 11, 2018 U.S. President Donald Trump told NATO leaders on Wednesday they should increase their defense spending to 4 percent of their country’s economic output, double the group’s current goal of two percent/
October 21, 2020 NATO spending has increased for the sixth consecutive year thanks to new contributions from allies, Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said in prepared remarks Wednesday...Canada and European countries' spending increased this year at a rate of 4.3 percent...Russia and China's aggressive behavior during Trump's term is one reason for the allies' increased spending.
Meanwhile, when procurement costs are taken into consideration (how much it cost for training and materials in respective countries relative to what they spend), then despite having far less to defend, the US military budget in 2019 was not larger than the next eleven countries. Rather it was smaller than the next three.
https://www.eurasiareview.com/11102021-debating-defense-budgets-why-military-purchasing-power-parity-matters-analysis/
There you have it, from the professedly no-bias very major news media.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.