Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sphinx

I’ve seen the movie and read the book Oppenheimer is based on. I found the long drawn out dramatic displays of Oppenheimer’s moral angst very annoying. I thought the portrayals of Groves and Strauss were excellent. I think Sam Waterson did a better job as Oppenheimer in the 1990s UK TV series on Oppenheimer.

The one thing in my opinion the movie didn’t do is bring out Oppenheimer’s moral arrogance.

I’ve only read the book on the Flower Moon story. Excellent book!


11 posted on 01/23/2024 8:41:32 AM PST by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reily

I am not a fan of Oppenheimer. He was a necessary evil that Gen. Groves made the correct decision to employ, but only because he probably figured Oppenheimer wouldn’t be able to give data to the Soviets, because it would be easy to trace back to him.

He was a Communist who associated with Communists and had to “go dark” when he took the government jobs.

And someone I do trust on this aspect, Richard Feynman (who would be considered a Libertarian but not a Conservative) said that all the handwringing about the bomb within the Los Alamos scientific team back then that we talk about today is completely overblown. He said there was almost none of that at the time.

Everybody had a job to do, and they did it. We were at war, and even the egghead scientists knew it.


42 posted on 01/23/2024 12:04:41 PM PST by rlmorel ("The stigma for being wrong is gone, as long as you're wrong for the right side." (Clarice Feldman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson