Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rdb3

It’s Plato vs. Aristotle.

Plato wanted the Republic to be run by the elites, who were always smarter than the schlubs, with the elites bolstered by an enforcement arm when necessary to keep the schlubs working in the cave while watching the shadows.

Aristotle wanted his political unit to consist of individuals and families, each working in the pursuit of eudemonia (”happiness”), a combination of sufficient health, wealth, beneficial relationships, and the knowledge of how to obtain them. These middle-classers would join themselves together in mutual support, what used to be called a “commonwealth,” and thereby strengthen each other’s lives while allowing for competition to bring out the best in everyone.

It isn’t too much of a leap to go from Plato to Hegel to Marx to Mao to the Democrat Party. And when we say we want to make America great again, what we really mean is that we want to make America Aristotle again—with our morals defined by Moses and Jesus, not by Mohammed and Satan.


8 posted on 01/21/2024 3:00:40 PM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: chajin

You are right. On that level, of ideology, it is Plato vs Aristotle. Good point.


20 posted on 01/21/2024 4:07:38 PM PST by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson