I dislike Nimrata as do most on here, but she was born in South Carolina therefore she is a natural US citizen, her parents birth places mean nothing in this case.
If she was born in the middle of the Ocean, would she be a natural American citizen?
I know a child born to American parents would, so I am asking if Niki would?
“...her parents birth places mean nothing in this case.”
Your opinion does not count in this case.
The writers of the Constitution added the natural born clause, and it means born of citizen parents, as per their own definition.
From your comment you likely did not even read fully Paul Ingrassia’s article. He covers all that and why being born in SC, i.e., the USA, is necessary but not sufficient to be considered an Article II “natural born Citizen” of the United States. Read Ingrassia’s article in full.
I suggest you also read this white pare on the “natural born Citizen” term by yours truly: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/naturalborncitizen/TheWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyandHowofNBC-WhitePaper.pdf
If her parents weren’t not citizens at the time of her birth Niki is not a natural born citizen. At least not Constitutionally. Unfortunately modern courts do not care for the law and they have routinely stated that even illegal aliens born on US soil are natural born citizens.