Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather
You rape a child that is under 18

Bad news for H.S. sweethearts where one turns 18 before the other.

3 posted on 01/13/2024 4:11:36 AM PST by Sirius Lee (Next week on The Bickersons...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sirius Lee

Anyone who points out the important difference between psychos attracted to prepubescent children and leches attracted to post pubescent teens is excoriated. The psychos need to be offed. The leches given jail time.


4 posted on 01/13/2024 4:38:40 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear (What is left around which to circle the wagons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sirius Lee
Bad news for H.S. sweethearts where one turns 18 before the other.

When laws are actually debated and written out before being passed, exceptions are usually defined. In existing statutory rape charging in various states, the relative age of the two parties is taken into consideration, so that the scenario you described carries less culpability than the statutory rape of a 13-year-old by a 25 or 30-year old or above, which is often the case with "mommy's boyfriend."

That said, any penetration of a pre-pubescent child by an adult for purposes of the adult's sexual gratification, which biologically would be at least a 6-year age difference, should indeed carry the possiblity of the death penalty.

11 posted on 01/13/2024 1:30:29 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Either ‘the Deep State destroys America, or we destroy the Deep State.’ --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson