If you are really a physician and your husband has a PhD in biochemistry, then why do I have to explain to you the nuances of feline injection site sarcoma causation, especially when I'm using the information in the articles YOU linked to do so?
While I recognize that the majority of physicians are not trained in research methodology, you still ought to be able to read and understand the medical literature. I'm pretty sure they teach that much in medical school. Plus, isn't there an ongoing CE requirement which includes reading medical literature in order to keep your license?
When the articles YOU linked state that feline injection site sarcoma is related to the injection injury, not the syringe contents, I am not engaging in pseudoscience when I point that out.
What you don’t understand you can’t explain so don’t bother. I will do you the favor of ignoring your posts in future.