Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: offduty

That’s the only hope they have as a DC jury will acquit.


25 posted on 01/05/2024 6:18:03 PM PST by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: sopo

Not a criminal proceeding. Lower threshold for the plaintiff. They don’t have the prove beyond a reasonable doubt, just a preponderance of the evidence.

Where this gets sticky for the defense is the shooting report was never made public. I believe the Capital Police only released the result. Now they will have to give the plaintiffs the entire report to include interviews, forensics, and initial witness statements.

It could also open the door to prior planning by not only the Capital Police (and Pelosi’s involvement) relevant video prior to and just after, and the officer’s propensity to mis-handle firearms.
That’s why I think they won’t take the risk of discovery and offer a sizable settlement.


30 posted on 01/05/2024 7:59:54 PM PST by offduty (Joe Biden, Commander in Thief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: sopo
That’s the only hope they have as a DC jury will acquit.

The lawsuit was filed in CA...I guess Judicial Watch does not want to deal with DC jury...But, I think Justice Department would probably succeed in moving the case to DC...After all, the shooting happened in DC...

DC jury...Not generally sympathetic to police...In my opinion...It is also very likely that DC jury is not very pro-Trump...

I think that it will be very hard for Judicial Watch to convince the DC jury to act in favor of Aaron Babbitt...

41 posted on 01/06/2024 1:14:51 AM PST by L.A.Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson