In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled NATO Directorate Warned Azov Remained ‘Fanatics.’ Recruits Acquired Canadian-Made Rifles. ‘It’s true that Azov was brought into the National Guard of Ukraine, but they are fanatics.’, ought-six wrote: “You’re pretending that you didn’t just claim all I ever posted was Q and maybe I was Q blah blah blah.”
Nice try, kid. You jump to conclusions and rush to judgment; so typical of losers. I mentioned your Q threads because they were at the very top of your profile page, and the first thing seen, and therefore prominent.
You still don't know what you're talking about? Or are you lying? You checked a table I made myself and then extrapolated to mean that's all I ever posted, starting in 2018. I just pointed out that I've been posting since 2008 but you are too fragile to admit your error..so...
“When I pointed out your falsehoods...”
What falsehoods, kid: Post them here, so we can all see them.
Just read your own post wherin you made false statements about my posting history and stupid hints that I might be Q. You know, before you started trying to rewrite what you actually posted...
“...you just whirl around without admitting your numerous errors and strike a pose...”
Nice try, kid,.
Casablanca? Or condescension? You make a stupid analysis of a portion of my posting history and then try to stick the landing, talking down to me as if I am a 'kid' beside your massive 'enlightment'. The 'kid' routine doesn't look good on you either. Why do you even need a pose?
“...that of ‘warrior against evil.’ That pose looks pathetic on you.”
No; I just don’t like fanaticism; of any stripe.
You shot your mouth off with a baseless ad hominem attack, and I pointed out your errors/distortions. Since then, you keep compulsively repeating 'Nice Try Kid.' You are wasting my time.
“You still don’t know what you’re talking about? Or are you lying? You checked a table I made myself and then extrapolated to mean that’s all I ever posted, starting in 2018.”
Nice try, kid. You assume facts not in evidence, jump to conclusions, and rush to judgment; all signs of someone who can’t support his own arguments. I made no such claim that your Q-boi threads were the only things you ever posted. But they must be significant to you, or else why have you posted the extensive list of them at the very top of your profile page? It is because you WANT people to see them! If you wanted to keep a record of them you could simply put them in your computer’s documents library. Good grief, kid; the primary purpose of a profile page is to introduce yourself and describe your interests. It’s a “Hey! Look at me!” page.
“I just pointed out that I’ve been posting since 2008 but you are too fragile to admit your error..so...”
Again, what error? Describe specifically what I said was an error. You can’t.
“Just read your own post wherin you made false statements about my posting history and stupid hints that I might be Q. You know, before you started trying to rewrite what you actually posted...”
What false statements about your posting history? Your Q threads? Kid, your own profile page defeats your claim.
Again, what statements of mine were false? Cite them, kid.
And, suggestions that you might be Q? It was a valid suggestion: QAnon came out of nowhere on 4chan on October 24, 2017; you began posting Q stuff on FR at least as far back as November 24, 2017, a mere four weeks later. Then, you began with your litany of Q threads not long afterwards (and you continue to do so in 2023). So, it’s a legitimate question: Are YOU Q? You could just as easily be Q’s press agent or publicist, given the amount of the Q stuff on FR you are responsible for. Or, you could just be a gullible Q fanboi. But, kid: A suggestion is not a claim; it is not an accusation; it is speculation, a question.
“Casablanca? Or condescension? You make a stupid analysis of a portion of my posting history and then try to stick the landing, talking down to me as if I am a ‘kid’ beside your massive ‘enlightment’. The ‘kid’ routine doesn’t look good on you either. Why do you even need a pose?”
Casablanca? You don’t even know the line from Casablanca: It’s, “Here’s looking at you, kid.” And I call you “kid” because you act as one. Kids are generally the ones who fall for conspiracy theories and parrot them, and fill their profile pages with shameless “look at me!” self-promotion. You fit the bill, kid.
“You shot your mouth off with a baseless ad hominem attack, and I pointed out your errors/distortions.”
Not baseless. And, again; what errors/distortions?
Grow up, kid.