Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: arthurus

As a retired military officer I believe it is my duty to keep trying to get the truth about the “natural born Citizen” term in the presidential eligibility clause of our U.S. Constitution properly adjudicated and decided by the U.S. Supreme Court even though as per Justice Thomas, they are evading the issue. Why are they evading it? Because they know that Obama, Harris, Ramaswamy, Cruz, Halley, Rubio and many others are not constitutionally eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of our military per the founders and framers original intent when they put the Natural Law “natural born Citizen” requirement into the Constitution for those who would be the Commander in Chief of our military once the founding generation was gone. It was a national security issue to them. They wanted future Commanders in Chief to be free of any foreign influence via their birth circumstances, i.e., not born a dual citizen or with any required foreign allegiance innately acquired via their birth circumstances. Sore more as the “why” that term was chosen, see: https://www.calameo.com/books/005841003b6b2119ce92d


167 posted on 01/01/2024 4:29:26 PM PST by CDR Kerchner ( retired military officer, natural born Citizen, natural law, Vattel, presidential, eligibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: CDR Kerchner

For sure!


177 posted on 01/02/2024 1:31:29 PM PST by arthurus (W covfefe }<>{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson