Yes It is a common misconception pushed by the Anti’s of all types.
Question: Can I open carry a rifle while hiking in a national park? I would want power and range to defend against a bear attack.
The gun banners would rather that you ended up as bear scat.
Grizzly bears are a protected species. Humans are not.
This is how libtards would prefer it.
You don't have a law to turn this right on and off. It is inalienable.
I swear these liberals don't have a lick of sense. Putting them in any position of authority is suicide for individuals and nations.
What about national forests and other federal lands?
Like the old saying goes “better judged by 12 men than eaten by 12 hungry grizzlies”
I don’t even care if it’s legal or not. Being alive is more important than avoiding prosecution for shooting an animal that is attacking me.
Once you exit Yellowstone, you've got no worries. Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana all have Constitutional Carry. If you can pass a background check, you can carry with no worries. (I'm NOT saying that passing a background check is a hard requirement to carry in those states. I'm saying that you can carry if you're not a prohibited person--that yardstick is being able to pass a basic background check to obtain a license to carry. In other words, don't be a felon.)