[EasySt]

It does little good to point to that, which isn’t even a contention I have put forth by the way, given all the other provocation going on. That’s what.

Peace was on the table. Signed and agreed to, even. On a promise Ukraine would not join NATO.

So who wants NATO right up against every Russian Border until the nukes start flying?

Who wants and needs World War 3 in order to maintain their new world “Order”?

[Petrosius]

Peace was on the table. Signed and agreed to, even. On a promise Ukraine would not join NATO.

Except that Russia reneged in Minsk II by not withdrawing its forces from Donbas and handing over the border to Ukrainian control, and by blocking the referendum that Ukraine had planed. If this is all about NATO expansion, then let Russia agree to withdrawal in exchange for Ukrainian neutrality. No? I did not think so.

[popdonnelly]

NATO is going to be right up against Russia’s border, and it was Putin’s aggression that brought it about. Given Putin’s imperial intentions, NATO should be right up against Russia’s border.

[freeandfreezing]

More BS, fake Russian propaganda talking points. Do you get an award if you post them all?

Remember, you need to deny that the Russian soldiers raped and murdered women in Bucha, and killed thousands of civilians in Russian speaking Mariupol.

You have just a few more lies to go and you get the pelmeni platter.