Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin19a

stylin19a wrote:


So then the ruling is held off till the USSC rules on it; I hope they do.

at least not before jan 6.

Now I’m confused...

I thought the Colo ruling was stayed pending the USSC action, and the action needed to happen between the time of the Colo ruling and Jan 4th.


1,810 posted on 12/21/2023 10:04:24 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((the more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1787 | View Replies ]


To: WildHighlander57
I'm thinking we are reading it right.

"any review by the U.S. Supreme Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court"

Review was sought. SCOTUS agreed to take up the review. The stay stays in place so the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.

If SCOTUS can wait til after the lock (The lock is Jan 5)until Jan 6 to make an order or mandate, it's too late for Colorado . But, depending on the ruling, affects all the other states itching to remove Pres. Trump from the ballot.
1,837 posted on 12/21/2023 1:27:22 PM PST by stylin19a (Back when men cursed & beat the ground with sticks, it was named witchcraft. Today it's named golf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1810 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson