Steve Van Doorn wrote:
“
said, “I hope the USSC smacks down the Colo supreme court ruling”
US supreme court doesn’t need to do anything. Trump will be on the ballot by their own ruling.
It says right in the ruling. When Trump appeals this to the US supreme court this case will have a stay on it.
They ruling pointless and makes a joke out of our legal system.
“any review by the U.S. Supreme Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court”
https://law.justia.com/cases/colorado/supreme-court/2023/23sa300.html
“
Ok the way I read this is, the Colo Court is saying they’ll hold off implementing the removal of PDJT’s name from the ballot till Jan 4th, and if there’s a challenge raised (by PDJT’s campaign or others) at the USSC between then and now, then the holding off will continue till the USSC decides on it.
I.e they’re saying that the challenge to their ruling and action by the USSC has a time limit, from now to Jan 4th.
The ruling -doesn’t- say anything about what happens after Jan 4th.
So, what good is this ruling anyway?
So, what good is this ruling anyway?
They got their headlines/lead story on cable "news".
January 6th they won't rate a "Remember This?" on a Trivial Pursuit game.