“25% VAIDS?”
The study referred to in the WND article never mentions VAIDS even once. More than that it says:
“No adverse effects were created by the error”
So it’s “0% VAIDS”.
Bob Unruh, the WND writer, either lacks reading comprehension or he’s lying about the study and hoping that no one will bother to check his source.
Bob Unruh, the WND writer
That right their used to be sufficient on FR for a good laugh. But now, we have "Bob Unruh", writing his blog post in World Nut Daily, recycling a story from "Slay News" of all places, linking to a story in the Telegraph that (finally) reports on a paper that surprisingly says nothing at all about the made-up "VAIDS" that is the lede of the World Nut Daily piece. Back in the day, WND would at least link to the original Telegraph story, but I guess it's just easier to stay with the fringy blog sources. It's certainly more entertaining, so at least we have that.