Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: volunbeer; Alas Babylon!; Tilted Irish Kilt; Qiviut; SeekAndFind; null and void; DoughtyOne; ...

I think Fauci probably had two different strategies for AIDs and Covid. Both designed to make his drug company friends rich. Note: his family was in the drug store business as he grew up.

For AIDs he might have started out seeking a vaccine, but it eventually became apparent that people could live a long time if they used certain combinations of drugs EVERY DAY OF THEIR LIFE. Think how much more drug companies could profit by providing daily doses of several drugs, rathar than giving an annual vaccine, or if it was like tetanus, once every 10 years.

On the other hand, providing a vaccine to billions of people that has to be repeated every few months as new variants develop (like flu) is a guaranteed $billions maker. Covid vaccines could have gone on untouched for years if they had not started giving serious symptoms to a significant number of people. And now there appear to be signs of serious damage to human immune systems, like IgG. These immune system dangers need MUCH LARGER studies for confirmation.

A big difference between AIDs and Covid is that AIDs requires direct physical (and often intimate) contact to be spread. ON the other hand, Covid, like the common cold and flu can be spread through the air. This difference guarantees that Covid will infect many more people than will AIDs. How quickly did Fauci or the drug companies realize that the big money in AIDs was in daily, lifetime drug treatment rather than in vaccines?


65 posted on 12/08/2023 9:18:26 AM PST by gleeaikin ( Question authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin

FWIW - my point about Fauci and his “blueprint” for both HIV and Covid was that he ignored (and even lied about) the things that worked (to include cheaper alternatives) in favor of “vaccines” or other new drugs with high costs. You and I both agree about the monetary incentives for big pharma, but this is not speculative financial instruments we are talking about - it was lives.

The human costs for both “Covid” and AIDS was huge as were profits for his friends.

The deliberate suppression of the benefits of vitamin D costs lives and it may have been the single most effective step to reduce illness. The lies about HCQ/zinc and IVM were outlandish.

I might be in the minority, but I genuinely believe cases could be made for negligent homicide charges as well as bribery.


66 posted on 12/08/2023 10:26:34 AM PST by volunbeer (We are living 2nd Thessalonians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson