>>I DO think we should just anon on, as Q obviously intended. (IMNSHO)
>>It’s upset ALL the right people, so far!
Your excellent points are why I STILL value the Q posts and will defend the concept of why we joined together to read and think and come to conclusions.
>>I DO think we should just anon on, as Q obviously intended. (IMNSHO)
>>It’s upset ALL the right people, so far!
Your excellent points are why I STILL value the Q posts and will defend the concept of why we joined together to read and think and come to conclusions.
~~~~~~~
We get to the heart of the matter when we realize that there actually exists a Real Mission of Anon Containment going on, centered on the misinformation that we are supposed to be waiting for some kind of Q Action Cure, instead of anon-ing on.
~Easy