Posted on 12/01/2023 6:14:33 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Ping for your interest
For batch 1, out of 711 vaccinated individuals, 152 fatalities were reported, indicating a staggering 21% mortality rate
Batch 8, with a 17% mortality rate,
Batch 3 with 15% mortality rate
Even among larger sample sizes, such as batch number 70 that vaccinated 11,000 individuals, there were 498 deaths accounted for, representing a 4% mortality rate.
Such numbers vastly exceed the expected mortality rates which is 0.75% and with Smith’s meticulous approach and diverse age distribution consideration, the suggestion that these outcomes are mathematically bordering on impossible becomes difficult to ignore.
21% ... 17% ... 15% ... 4% ... mortality rate....
The Daisy Duke $hot $hills will STILL deny.
But, what more do we expect from CDC/BigPharma bots?
“Winston Smith”? As in Orwell’s 1984? Forgive me if I’m a bit wary of this story.
It’s denialism tied in with egoism, tied in with societal pressure and societal inertia.
That’s why.
so they had some minor issues with production quality control that got better over time.
nothing to see here, move on already
All kinds of isms 😂
RE: so they had some minor issues with production quality control that got better over time.
Yep, but what about the poor slobs who were FORCED by government to take the tainted quality vaccines?
“ For batch 1, out of 711 vaccinated individuals, 152 fatalities were reported, indicating a staggering 21% mortality rate”
************************************************************
I wonder if they’ve tracked down (or plan to track down) all 711 individuals to do DETAILED health assessments. It would seem to be negligent to not do so.
“21% ... 17% ... 15% ... 4% ... mortality rate....
The Daisy Duke $hot $hills will STILL deny.
But, what more do we expect from CDC/BigPharma bots?”
Yep, the Branch Covidians are always going to be here and try to gaslight us.
What insane person would think that almost 1% would be acceptable?
For batch 1, out of 711 vaccinated individuals, 152 fatalities were reported, indicating a staggering 21% mortality rate....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So is the reader to assume the timeframe for these fatalities are from the initial rollout of the batch to today? Are most of the fatalities immediately after the shot and then taper off? Or do they mostly start after a year or two? Since they have the data that people died, they likely know when they died....
Pfizer just might end up wishing it would have been satisfied with the profits it made from Viagra.
p
The odds in this lottery are good. Well, it does depend on what counts as a “win”.
To re-work the old saying: If you don’t play you won’t lose.
Gives it away as satire.
Good catch... but it could be a real name.
Think this had anything to do with Jacinda Ardern resigning unexpectedly in January & beating cheeks to get out of New Zealand? I will never forget a video of her smirking & laughing when questioned about her draconian mandates making life very difficult for anyone refusing the jabs.
My first thought when I saw the name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.