“I admired Joe Namath, who apparently was just as bad.”
Based on what? The man says Namath “should” have known. Is that evidence? Maybe in the 13th century.
Good catch. There should be a countersuit for slander.
“Based on what? The man says Namath “should” have known. Is that evidence? Maybe in the 13th century.”
They’ve successfully destroyed Joe Pa’s reputation with the “should have known “ rule. They’ve been using it against Jim Jordan too.
Read the article, not what you think it said. Reading doesn’t hurt. It’s even fun, and might save you from making mistakes like this.
“And how do you KNOW she’s a witch?”