It appears eight of the eleven transplant recipients got an infection by multi-drug-resistant bacteria, but were cured by the fecal transplant taking hold.
If this understanding is correct, that was a 73% remediation rate, effectively from the fecal transplant, but initially caused by the mass antibiotics given, to “reduce” bacterial problems.
We can create bizarre issues, when trying to do well, for others. You do need to get rid of pathogenic concerns, but then you can have some remain that cause further problems.
To: Mazey; ckilmer; goodnesswins; Jane Long; BusterDog; jy8z; ProtectOurFreedom; matthew fuller; ...
The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List
This high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.
Email me to get on either the “Common/Top Issues” (20 - 25% fewer pings) or “Everything” list.
2 posted on
11/05/2023 8:06:53 AM PST by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: ConservativeMind
4 posted on
11/05/2023 8:39:59 AM PST by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: ConservativeMind
I’ve read about three multiple sclerosis patients that were healed and restored to walking, as the result of fecal transplants.
I read an article about a slender mother who became obese after getting a fecal transplant from her obese daughter.
More research needed. Problem is, there is no big pharma $$ to be had.
5 posted on
11/05/2023 10:12:13 AM PST by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23 "And THIS is His commandment . . . . ")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson