These read like transient side effects after the shot while hyped as permanent neurological disorders.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Nearly 1 In 3 COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients Suffered Neurological Side Effects: Study Published in the Journal Vaccines., newzjunkey wrote: These read like transient side effects after the shot while hyped as permanent neurological disorders.
“A shocking 31.2 percent of respondents to this large dataset sustained neurologic injury after two injections with verified data in health registries,” he wrote. “
Data collected from health registries may consist of diagnostic notes on a single ER visit wherein symptoms are reported lasting X days leading up to the visit, but no follow up is conducted. This can conceal deaths, strokes etc. which happen after a 'headache' visit, or it may be transient neurologic impacts ending two days after the visit.
But, although duration and outcome aren't always known, the safety signal is triggered anyway (because it's necessary to find out) given no other 'shot' has anything comparable to the Covid 'vaccines' in terms of adverse events, transient OR lasting.
VAERS has a message on it's website, or did throughout the pandemic (I haven't checked recently) stating none of the adverse events records would be updated. So theoretically, headache and chills and fainting 2 days after 'vaxxed' would remain the record of adverse events, even if the person began experiencing blood clots, heart attacks etc. The safety signal is supposed to indicate the urgent need to halt administration so these records can be investigated and the duration of adverse events identified. But, no government has been willing to collect that data - they don't want it, and they don't want the public to have it.