Refuting Climate Change with Chlorophyll

In order for Global Warming/Global Cooling/Climate Change (or whatever they call it next) to become catastrophic, it must start overcoming Chlorophyll first. And, until scientists can prove that we are at that point, climate theories are just so much hogwash.

Found in most plants, and some animals, Chlorophyll cells take in Carbon Dioxide and Sunlight and expel Oxygen. Animals (including humans like us) take in Oxygen into our lungs (gills in fish) and expel Carbon Dioxide.

Chlorophyll cells LOVE Carbon Dioxide, increased warmth and cause plants and plankton to grow and multiply rapidly.

Current Climate theories have not taken the effects of increased plant/Plankton-Chlorophyll relationship to increased Carbon Dioxide CO2, and warmth to see what the true tolerances are.

Thus, the many failed and continuing to fail climate predictions will continue to abound all the more.

“Climate change is just another Trojan horse for marxism.”

Bingo.

It is the creation of a “crisis” so more socialist controls can be put in place to “solve” the crisis.

I was thinking about all the large animals that used to roam the planet, the ones in the Jurassic period.

I wondered how they could sustain themselves and why the largest land animals today are so much smaller.

I theorize the answer is because the CO2 levels were much higher which allowed lots more plant life to proliferate, and which in turn increased the oxygen supply and the food sources for them.

Look at a T-Rex or a Brontosaurus and tell me they are land animals. No, both look to me to be river creatures, who may have gone on land to reproduce and lay their eggs. But these both look suited for rivers or rocky seacoasts.

The T-rex would be well suited for eating dead dinosaur carcasses floating down the rivers or seacoasts. Those big feet and claws holding fast to rocks on the river bottom. Those small arms for pulling on the meat at the shoreline and those teeth to rend the carcasses.

And a Brontosaurus, also in the water to eat the volume of dead plants where those thick legs, not suited for land, hold fast in sand and silty riverbeds. Where their long necks allow the head to eat up dead and other plants along the riversides.

I also imagine, if you saw them in the river, you would see only the tops of their heads while moving, and the whole head while eating. You would not want to see their bodies on land while breeding, because I imagine these two types fiercely protecting their nests and precious eggs.

For what are animals, but creatures to clean up the environment? And these would do it very well IMHO.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.