Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: backpacker_c

Well, he probably planned to not be the only one that would try to vacate the speakership because w/o 3 or 4 others, he’d look foolish when it failed. So, in his planning stage, he might’ve seen who might be a possible replacement. Before today (& this wasn’t planned), they could’ve gone to 2024 (not a typo) with no speaker. So, what I’m saying is that he & we lucked out.


74 posted on 10/25/2023 1:05:22 PM PDT by pookie18 (You don’t have to be high on crack to enjoy Pookie’s Toons! - Tell It Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: pookie18

I see where many were saying there should have been other candidates lined up....

But at this point, how many other statements and promises did mccarthy have to break or fail to go through with, before someone tried to hold him on it?

And as it is, what non polarizing house member would have been elected, with mccarthy still interferring from the background (see the Gaetz interview with Bannon for info)?

As it is, I’m surprised with the Johnson pick, but Charlie Kirk seems to approve, so he’s likely as good a choice as the republicans might be able to come together on.


80 posted on 10/25/2023 1:16:31 PM PDT by backpacker_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

A gentle reminder that when the Declaration of Independence was signed, they didn’t have a plan for what was next.


97 posted on 10/25/2023 2:50:26 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Trump. He stands for the great issues of the day. Stay the course!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson