I'm not buying into conspiracy theories despite your frequent accusations.
They lied. Period.
They have destroyed the trust people put in them like any liar would.
It s not conspiracy theory territory to conclude that if they were caught doing it once or twice, that they've done it before and will do it again.
It's common sense and only someone naive or totally gullible would just go on blindly trusting someone who has proved themselves untrustworthy.
Trust needs to be earned. It's not a God given right, and once it's lost is VERY difficult to get back again.
They have destroyed the trust people put in them like any liar would.
Once again, what are the specifics? What did the journal The Lancet say that was a demonstrable lie? If they lied, then certainly, you should be able to say what the specific lie(s) is (are) or at least provide a link. You can't just post random unsubstantiated claims that The Lancet lied and expect to be convincing.
Oh, BTW, posting such claims is a big indicator that you are prone to believing conspiracies, whether you deny believing in conspiracies or not.
A little information about not only The Lancet, but every other reputable medical/scientific journal in existence. These journals exist to publish research reports written by scientists and research-trained MDs working in a variety of public and private organizations all over the world. The content of those research reports is not written by journal staff, nor do they represent the opinions of the journal staff. So, the claim that a journal "lied" is a bit puzzling, to say the least. This is like saying the office supply catalog I just got in the mail lied.