Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: odawg

Reading that somebody (you) understands this, I jumped the gun stating that you were “exactly” correct.

You made a YUGE error referencing the Naturalization Act of 1790. In the act it inaccurately defines “natural born citizen”.

This was corrected by the Naturalization Act of 1795 by REPEALING the Naturalization Act of 1790.

SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That the Act intitled, “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization,” passed the twenty-sixth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety, be, and the same is hereby repealed.


86 posted on 10/23/2023 9:02:53 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: faucetman

“In the act it inaccurately defines “natural born citizen”.”

No, nah, it did not define the natural born citizen inaccurately. I, and millions of others, were taught by professors in college with PhDs as someone born of citizen parents.

I don’t know how that idiocy about defining natural born got started.


125 posted on 10/23/2023 10:55:56 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson