Thank you very much! That sounds very likely, and thanks for the link to Miller thanking Pence. I wanted to find it but was too tired to try.
If my best guess is correct (post 2005), that would make Pence either a leveraged or snow white hat playing a role while the investigations and maybe even secret prosecutions are being conducted. It’s looking less and less like President Trump and the Q team genuinely wanted Pence to reject the alternate slates of electors from the swing states. Future revelations of the Space Force election interference discoveries, and any subsequent prosecutions, will have significantly more consequential effects on the nation’s psyche than the mere substitution of electors in 2020, or even a seamless second term for PDJT.
Prior to 2020, I’m not sure there was a critical mass of citizens who believed elections needed stronger protections and were willing to demand them. If the manners of cheating are as varied and effective as we here know they are/have been, electing someone to effect those protections has been and would continue to be impossible, precisely because of the effectiveness of the cheating. If the Pence/Miller mission was to identify and expose the cheating in an undeniable way to the public, and demonstrate the need for changes to prevent it going forward, the resulting momentous effects on the US and the world from having honest elections can’t be overstated. In my mind, it’s the seed from which all good things grow.
I don’t particularly like or agree with Stephen Miller’s position on Ukraine, if it is as stated, but his opinion is not related to his role in collecting the evidence of election fraud on the home front in 2020 - if indeed that was “the most complex military operation the US has ever conducted”. Miller is the baby and his opinion on Ukraine is the bathwater. I can throw out the latter and keep the baby.