Wrong, no pit bull that has been properly socialized, trained and owned by responsible owners, attack without being provoked.That's an improvable assertion. Try again.
It is not provable you are correct, the counter argument is just as unprovable.
Most people who want to ban them only know what they’ve read or heard in the media.
I said to another poster who called me a hypocrite for not owning a Pit Bull, if you don’t own one but support banning them that would be the same level of hypocrisy.
That's an improvable assertion. Try again.
It is also a great example of a "No true Scotsman" logical fallacy.