So, yes, you HAVE claimed that the attacks are because of bad owners.
You have never owned (and never will?) a pit, so I don't get your stubborn refusal to see reason. But please don't respond because you're clearly engaging in this discussion for amusement.
If people stopped posting as a source of amusement, the traffic on FR would drop by about 80%, why do you and others respond, is it a source of amusement or you think your argument is so strong it will change my opinion.
I have claimed most Pit Bull attacks are the result of bad owners, I’ve also said, compare the ownership bad dog owners with bad gun owners and the result often times is the same.
Being argumentative and contrary to provoke a reaction is known as *trolling*.
And there we have one by its own admission.