Why do you assume that every attack is the result of a crazed animal and not bad owners.
I’ve said this multiple times in this thread.
If Pit Bulls were gone tomorrow, would those owners remain dogless or would they acquire another aggressive breed dog like Rottweiler, Malinois, etc. and be just as irresponsible.
The history in this country is banning things often times doesn’t solve the problem and often makes it worse.
I've never said they were "crazed". Dogs have been bred for centuries for specific attributes. Pits, unfortunately, were bred to attack and kill. No antecdote of some one-off mean Golden Retreiver is going to sway reasonable people to believe there's some sort of equivalency that you are determined to promote.