It is NOT ‘news’.
Those of us accused of wearing ‘tin hats’ have been parroting inflammation for decades. Past researchers have reached the same conclusion but were professionally persecuted for daring to mention any relation to vaccines.
Frankly, my research has concluded that medical orthodoxy - including psychology - is largely at fault, coupled with the cattle mentality of doctors’ visits in this era (and it’s getting worse every year).
The problem I’ve cited is the lack of $$ for hard research, i.e., the fact that - aside from genetic causes (a distinct minority imho) - the inflammation has an external cause.
Personally, I believe there are a handful of synergistic causes - INCLUDING the vaccine SCHEDULE - but we’ll never know how parents can avoid the landmines without removing bias from the research grant approval process.
If this study paves the way for more research dollars toward infant inflammation causes, I’ll concede a ‘news’ aspect.
But I have good reason to be highly skeptical.
I am not disagreeing with you that inflamation is by far an underapreciated, denied or outright mendatiously misrepresented cause of disease. The finding here is narrow but significant. My brother is schizophrenic and an asthmatic, which caught my eye here.
Back in the day when my children were little, the doc gave a pink sheet of all the possible complications of vaccines. Death was on that list. Bèing young and dumb, i threw them away. Do they still give that information to parents? Somehow, I think not.