Posted on 10/12/2023 4:58:59 AM PDT by bigdaddy45
“I think that’s pretty naive (or propagandistic).”
What? That BB Netanyahu has lost elections over the fact that he was a little bit too strict on Palestinian issues? That’s a fact. All you have to do is look at the election he lost and read the narrative around the elections and why he lost.
You might be a pragmatist, but there’s plenty of deranged thinking out there. Netanyahu has always faced opposition within his own party, within the Knesset, within the political spectrum of Israel. For some odd reason anti-conservatism in the country that really does need level-headed leadership exists. I don’t know why? But it’s apparent and expressed opinions are easily researched. Our own MSM is complicit in forwarding this obscure positioning.
Netanyahu might even have been a bit hamstrung and not able to put forward the security posture that is necessary through his experience and the experience of the country he is leading. This past week was a wake up call to the left-leaning activists in country. Terrible circumstances, absolutely.
No, I took your comment to suggest that Bibi’s problems led to Israel somehow missing this attack.
That is naive or propagandistic.
“But Hamas is not a natural disaster.”
Marxist will exploit any crises, planned or otherwise. They are not prejudiced in that regard.
Otherwise... defined as: natural disaster’s, which institutes further restrictions on the population as a result. In the US it is a page right out of the Democrat playbook.
But that’s not relevant to this situation, which is not a natural disaster.
Typical liberal post. It was the liberal government swamp under Netanyahu that failed. Netanyahu has had military agency heads opposing him for months in their Supreme Court proposal. That swamp failed him.
“But that’s not relevant to this situation, which is not a natural disaster.”
It’s a behavioral “algorithm,” a tool, used often...nothing to lose any sleep over. It fits many situational issues and ha become a predictable kneejerk no matter the event. Alinski acolytes are very fond of the employment.
No, it’s not. It is based on taking advantage of something not caused by those making use of it.
This was allowed or made to happen for specific purpose.
Take the loss and move on.
“No, it’s not. It is based on taking advantage of something not caused by those making use of it.
This was allowed or made to happen for specific purpose.”
Now there’s one twisted conspiracy theory! And one right out of “Rules for Radicals” except... how do you make thousands of Hamas cross the border and start executing thousands?
I don’t think Netanyahu is capable of holding that kind of sway. FDR once said that “nothing happens in politics without a reason.”
There’s one problem, this isn’t politics. It’s Jihad.
If you are claiming the attack wasn’t allowed to happen, you are either naive or a propagandist.
“If you are claiming the attack wasn’t allowed to happen, you are either naive or a propagandist.”
Yeah... you said that about nine times already. But you’re wrong.
“If you are claiming the attack wasn’t allowed to happen, you are either naive or a propagandist”
Until the boots on the ground information starts filtering through everything you say is total BS. Now that could change but you don’t have anywhere near all the information and neither do I. So it’s not propaganda you’re just unfiltered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.