bttt
Should be. Won’t be.
He is saying the shots give you cancer Freepers
This is serious stuff
!!
What we knew ping. đ˘
Why is this guy opposed to science?
I was diagnosed with cancer on October 18th, 1991.
I read enough about covid on FreeRepublic to know I was never going to get the vaccine.
Now I’m thrilled that I didn’t get it!
I developed post menopausal bleeding following the first shot⌠uterine cancer diagnosis confirmed a year later.
âWow interesting article from someone who is an esteemed professor and immunologist .... â
I would pay attention to an esteemed doctor like this guy long before listening to any of the vaxx shills.
Bookmark.
In before the vaxaholics.
Save to show daughter. A nurse who will most likely be forced to get a booster. :(
If true, they’ll have to revoke this year’s Nobel Prize in Medicine.
.
Good article from a respected and experienced doctor. Thanks
A good friend of my wife was just diagnosed with leukemia. I don’t know her vax status, but she’s in the San Francisco Bay Area so I expect she had the jabs. She lost her husband to another cancer less than a year ago. She has two children, one in late teens and one around 13.
Dr. Ryan Cole and many others have seen the big uptick in very aggressive cancers. But the government and MSM continue to deny it.
bookmark
It is a hot mess of contamination, âunexpectedâ ramifications, immune system damage, physical reactions, intended harm, criminal grifting, bad science, and political malfeasance.
THOSE of us who knew from the beginning that the sequence of CoV-SARS-2 contained inserts which could not have possibly occurred naturally, and were similar to ones that had already been published from the Wuhan laboratory, have had to endure unbelievable scorn, scientific ostracism
The SARS-CoV2 virus contains NO unnatural inserts. The sequence of SARS-CoV2 is in the public domain and anyone can check it. I checked it personally. Unnatural sequences simply are not there.
As for SARS-CoV2 sequences being similar to other sequences published by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, it would be surprising if they were NOT similar. After all, the Wuhan Institute has been studying bat coronaviruses for years because scientists have long recognized the potential for a coronavirus to develop pandemic potential. They publish the sequences. Bat coronaviruses have similar sequences. Actually, all coronaviruses have similar sequences.
First the âvaccineâ did not stay at the site of injection as promised but travelled throughout the body and were found at post-mortems to be everywhere.
It would have been REALLY nice to see a scientific reference to support this claim. I'm pretty good at finding references, even when antivaxxers purposely try to hide the actual papers they used. Professional antivaxxers do not like to give details of the papers they are misusing, even when they use real scientific papers. Sometimes, they just invent references. But I could find nothing that could be cherry-picked and misinterpreted to come up with such a claim. I used the search term "mrna vaccine systemic distribution" in the www.pubmed.gov medical/scientific literature database. Nope, didn't find it.
Last June, whistleblowers led by the scientists Sucharit Bhakdi and Kevin McKernan raised an entirely new issue of concern â that of serious levels of DNA contamination.
This is speculation based on a paper that McKernan wrote and posted on some "pre-publication" website. The fact that he could not get it published in a legitimate scientific journal says a lot. For a detailed debunking of this claim, I refer to this article: Claim that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines contain DNA contaminants based on study of vials of âunknown provenanceâ; no evidence COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can alter DNA in people.
It reports that McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials, a sequence that is âused to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapiesâ and that this is âsomething that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccinesâ. These SV40 promoters are also well recognised as being oncogenic or cancer-inducing
This is also debunked in the article I linked. SV40 promoters are NOT oncogenic. A promoter is a gene element that signals to the RNA transcription enzymes to attach to the DNA and transcribe the gene following the promoter. Transcription is the biological process of "reading" DNA to make RNA. In mRNA vaccine production, the SV40 promoter actually causes transcription of an antibiotic resistance gene. The promoter used to make spike mRNA is a T7 promoter, which only works in bacteria. None of the DNA plasmids used to make the spike mRNA contain any oncogenes.
Interestingly, that debunking article points out that SARS-CoV2 genes do integrate into the genome of infected cells. But the vaccine spike mRNA can't do that.
Oh, I should point out that the integration of a virus genome into human DNA can potentially cause cancer. If that virus genome inserts itself into the promoter sequence of genes involved in regulating cell growth, it can cause them to become unregulated and grow uncontrollably.
Well, I think this is all I have the energy to debunk right now. This blog was written by piling on so many lies that it becomes extremely time-intensive to rebut every single one. And that highlights a challenge for the scientific community: we can only discern the truth through long and tedious research, but fear-mongerers can swamp our truths under massive volumes of lies in moments.
A typical gene:
Promoter--start of gene--middle of gene--end of gene--signal to stop transcription.
The RNA transcription enzymes attach on the promoter and fall off at the stop sequence.
absolutely!
bkmk