Pierra smiles at one point in the conversation. He must have felt like a cat toying with a mouse.
I stand with Israel.
Pierre smiles at one point in the conversation. He must have felt like a cat toying with a mouse.
___________________________________
Pierre has either had media training, he’s well-educated, or he’s just very smart. As business majors in University, we were required to take one course in the humanities in order to graduate, so I chose a philosophy course called “Basic Logic”. That was hands down the best course of my entire three-year program because it taught me how to break down everything I see and hear in a logical way. We also studied the logical fallacies that are used by people to persuade you when they don’t have facts or truth on their side. Listening to Pierre Poilievre made me wonder if he took the same course. The reporter used at least three different fallacies in his 2:19 minute interview, and Pierre didn’t fall for any of them (straw man - falsely states Poilievre’s position, ad hominem -”you’re Trump-like”, ad populum - “many [unnamed] people say”). My opinion of Pierre rose a great deal in those 2 minutes, and there was something amusing about him eating an apple while taking on a leftie journalist ill-equipped for his mission.