The correlation between jabs and excess deaths in every country was massively outstanding—after there not being excess deaths until then, what are you talking about?
Again, try to muster some logic to your analysis.
“Again, try to muster some logic to your analysis.”
Why don’t you do some research on the correlation between the time frames listed on your graph. They spike. At each time they spike when each new strain comes into focus. If the vaccines were contributory as much as you seem to think to the deaths, then why did the level of them come down. They certainly didn’t stop the injections. Factually as more and more companies put out vaccines or medication that is lauded by people was introduced, if it was working the spike would have stayed down or just briefly gone up and returned down, which it did. If the vaccines were killing people the trend toward the raised amounts would have continued to rise and they didn’t.
Do I think the vaccines worked. Not really. They had the possibility of doing what they were designed to do and that’s provoke the immune system to do it’s job. But, I’ll repeat, vaccines do not kill virus. And furthermore are only contributory to the body doing it.
“You are sorely lacking in logic here.”
Read the graphs, you gave them to me.
“…you Big Pharma shill.”
If you can’t disprove the topic, try to belittle the messenger. Old tactic that never works unless you have nothing positive to add about the topic.
“Again, try to muster some logic to your analysis.”
Try to read what you sent me and its obvious analysis. The spike happened on each graph, and decreased in amounts concurrent with the new strains. If the deaths were vaccine related like you are claiming, then they wouldn’t have gone down, they’d have continued to rise especially as more and more “cures” (vaccines) were put on the market or medication misused and claimed as the elixer.
I don’t debate with people whose only appearing logic is I don’t believe anyone and telling me I’m not capable of logical thought unless I determine your case to be correct because you say so and the evidence you send me doesn’t support you.
Additionally, I don’t care what people are saying about the vaccines as it is none of my business. It is their bodies and their determination. And I never got into this thread for a debate on the vaccines. I entered that Rodgers had no reason to take a public shot at another football player, based on his uneducated opinion. He has a right to it, but not to try to embarrass or demean another person in a business filled with so many “experts” in medical science and based upon earning their living by fan support.
We are talking apples, vaccines, and oranges, Rodgers behavior, so there’s no reason to continue this trying to imply a point using your evidence while trying to insult me. You prove my point using the same tactics Rodgers did. You waste my time. Good luck.
Wy69