Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

No mention of tattoos.


2 posted on 10/02/2023 2:12:38 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Steely Tom

From what I understand, aging has never improved a tattoo.


6 posted on 10/02/2023 2:20:17 PM PDT by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Steely Tom

“No mention of tattoos.”

LOL...let’s see, how to interpret that?

1. “I made it to 70 without a tat. I sure missed out on a lot. I’m going to go get some ink right now”

Or

2. “I made it to 70 without a tat and happy I did. I’ll keep it up.”

I’m seeing more 60 to 70 year olds getting tats. By getting droopy, sagging, crepe skin tatted they avoid the problem of getting a tat while you are young and then having your skin go all saggy, droopy, and crepey on you ruining your tat.

I’ve yet to see a single person where a tat helped their appearance. They could have spent those tat hours in the gym and gotten a lot more good looks for the money spent.


23 posted on 10/02/2023 2:49:41 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson