I hear your thoughts on this. It appears that the US leadership does not share them.
Do you not think that if we are going to support the Ukes on an ongoing and endless basis, it is better that we go all in and at least get SOMETHING for our support. By Something I mean the Ukes either winning or shoving the Russians out of their territory and forcing a peace on favorable Uke terms?
Otherwise all we have delivered to them will have been for nothing. How would that be good? Serious polite questions here please.
I want ZERO US involvement in Ukraine.
No arms, no fighter jets, no billions of dollars.
This is NOT our fight. It is designed to enrich the pockets of elites and our corrupt politicians in D.C.
Those who support Ukraine in this suicide mission are utter fools.
Russian troops are in Russian Federation territory, not in The Ukraine.
I agree disappointing, to see these drips and drabs, western aircraft should have been there months ago, atacms as well, Russia has one card left to play and that is nuclear, and as the SNL skit from years ago showed, that option is not a good one
My opinion is Russia is on a logistic knife edge and a relatively small push could end this, with that said. Ukraine can’t sustain an extended like years long conflict at this level of manpower attrition(neither can Russia, but we know they couldn’t care less about manpower losses, well till the do…)
The attacks on military and infrastructure targets in Crimea are a good start to that tipping point
excellent point:
“Do you not think that if we are going to support the Ukes on an ongoing and endless basis, it is better that we go all in and at least get SOMETHING for our support. By Something I mean the Ukes either winning or shoving the Russians out of their territory and forcing a peace on favorable Uke terms?”