Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Uber-Eng
” What limited knowledge I have on law is that I believe many court rulings are decided on precedents(?). Therefore if we didn’t have legitimately elected lawmakers at the time or our country was coerced into becoming a corporation in 1871, then rulings since then *may* not stand up to review.”

Horry Sheet!!!

If that case were made it would take away a woman’s right to vote, inherit property, etc. Any legislation would become moot. Possibly any laws passed by the federal government or adjudicated by the federal courts would be non existent. Not sure the states would follow suite since there is a separation in the original bill of rights reserving anything outside the federal as residing with “The States”

This concept leaves a lot for anyone to wrap their head around. PS I’m not a lawyer either but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn.

2,342 posted on 09/27/2023 10:23:03 AM PDT by thingumbob (Be honest, you didn't trust the science, you trusted the Tell-a-vision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2335 | View Replies ]


To: thingumbob

“If that case were made it would take away a woman’s right to vote, inherit property, etc. Any legislation would become moot.”

All of those things could be rapidly addressed interpretively, through fresh, new uncorrupt legislative body, or by the states. I.e. women’s right to vote would get covered by “all men” being interpreted as all citizens, or all tax paying citizens, etc…


2,356 posted on 09/27/2023 11:36:15 AM PDT by Axenolith (MALITHS HOMINUM EST OBVIANDUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2342 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson