Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

I listen to both sides of the Q and decide for myself. I found her interesting. Not sure if she is credible or not. But I would say the same thing about Jordan Slather. Hopefully someday we will know the entire story.


179 posted on 09/17/2023 5:18:58 PM PDT by defconw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: defconw

I’m familiar with Jordan Sather’s track record, and he has specialized in exposing fraudsters. ymmv


201 posted on 09/17/2023 6:48:58 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

To: defconw

Reasoning includes just that. Everyone could find something to appreciate in Jan Halper’s reveal to BBC. Parts of it perked ears, naturally, when she structured certain events as facts that are yet unknown, unproven, or only unconvincing.

POTUS Trump gave Halper a timely and unmitigated thumbs-up.
I have no interest in blowing that off as meaningless, just yet.

It was a dignal of some kind. He parsed nothing she said. She may have very well mis-informed or dis-informed certain targets, possibly on command. Too curious that it was on
mainstream British media where she dropped her Q+ bombshells.

These tales have room to rise or fall as either truth or fiction. Meanwhile, POTUS speaks as Q presently. Trump may delay direct answers, but he is no liar.


327 posted on 09/18/2023 11:30:42 AM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey. For Greater Glory.;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson