[sjmjax]

Just tried it on Duck-Duck. Inappropriate images as the article suggests for white or straight white couples.

[KC_Conspirator]

Google is lying. The algorithms have been biased for a long time.

Expect the same with AI. Tech firms are throwing out AI results that do not match liberal narratives.

I work in tech, but you dont have to be a lifetime pro to figure that out.

[dr_lew2]

On the model of “caveat emptor” ( let the buyer beware )

s/b “caveat scrutator”

( Latin fan, but not a scholar )

[FreeReign]

Google isn’t a “search engine”. It’s a propaganda tool.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

I just tried this on DuckDuckGo: exact same results.

One of the good things about nuclear war is that it would wipe out the coastal cities, thus cleaning up this mess for good.

[FreedomPoster]

If you’re a FReeper and Google is your default search engine, you are doing it wrong.

DeGoogle your lives, people.

Resources for that:

https://old.reddit.com/r/degoogle/

[Maris Crane]

I know the Search Cite I use is influenced by the Big G, but at least I never go to the Big G for ANY INFORMATIO...INFORMATION THAT...THEY...WANT YOU TO SEE.

No thanks. Bunch of Foreigners.

[icclearly]

But wait.

Everybody knows that control of all means of media and communications is the "key to the mind of the masses."

Don't believe me. Ask Joseph Goebbels.

Why do you think he was one of Hitler's closest allies?

Ever wonder why? 'Cause it works. Just look around you. Look at what it led to in Germany in the 30s.

Google is just "high tech" propaganda only just a bit more cleverly disguised.

[daniel1212]

Attempted explanation:

, when people post images of white couples, they tend to say only "couples" & not provide a race. But when there are mixed couples, then "white" gets mentioned. Our image search depends on heavily words -- so when we don't get the words, this can happen. — Danny Sullivan (@dannysullivan) January 3, 2019

So lets try a better "canary" test:
"the bible only condemns homosexual relations" (without quotes):

Rather than most of the top results affirming this fact, 6 out of the top 10 either deny this fact or question it.

And "HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS are sin in the BIBLE" (without quotes):

The top 2 results deny this, hollowed by a mix.

And incredibly, searching for "HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS are sin in the BIBLE" in quotes results in,
No results found for "HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS are sin in the BIBLE". Despite there being 1.13 billion websites on the world wide web as of June 2023. ...

And "HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS and the BIBLE"
results in just 11 results.